DeepSeek changes rules of AI’s great game - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

DeepSeek changes rules of AI’s great game

Chinese start-up’s breakthrough may be bad news for US tech giants but could be a windfall for everyone else

It’s hard to talk about 21st-century economic history without discussing the “China shock”. That is the term often used to describe China’s entrance into the global market, a change that brought rich countries an abundance of cheap goods, but left entire industries and workforces mothballed.

DeepSeek may provide a sequel. A little-known Chinese hedge fund has thrown a grenade into the world of artificial intelligence with a large language model that, in effect, matches the market leader, Sam Altman’s OpenAI, at a fraction of the cost. And while OpenAI treats its models’ workings as proprietary, DeepSeek’s R1 wears its technical innards on the outside, making it attractive for developers to use and build on.

Things move faster in the AI age; terrifyingly so. Five of the biggest technology stocks geared to AI — chipmaker Nvidia and so-called hyperscalers Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta Platforms — collectively shed almost $750bn of market value before US markets opened on Monday. It could be particularly grim for Nvidia if it proves true that DeepSeek won without the use of its shiniest chips.

Investors in tech companies — including Europeans such as chipmaker ASML, and energy companies that investors hoped would get a boost from fuelling data centres — are left wondering whether their investments will go up in smoke. The hyperscalers were due to plough almost $300bn into capital expenditure this year, according to Visible Alpha estimates. Analysts expect that on Wednesday, when they report earnings, Meta and Microsoft will report investment for 2024 totalling $94bn.

In truth, the game isn’t over. DeepSeek’s actual potential is still unclear, and it has yet to achieve “artificial general intelligence”, the humanlike state that Meta and OpenAI are pursuing. But the rules might have changed. At the very least, DeepSeek may take some of the US giants’ customers. At worst, it has challenged the core belief that more hardware is the key to better AI. That principle has underpinned the market value of Silicon Valley companies as they invest hand over fist.

What’s bad for the hyperscalers could still be a windfall for everyone else. For most business users, having the absolute best model is less important than having one that’s reliable and good enough. Not every driver needs a Ferrari. Advances in reasoning such as R1 could be a big step for “agents” that deal with customers and perform tasks in the workplace. If those are available more cheaply, corporate profitability should rise.

In that sense, this second China shock could resemble the first. It could bring not just destruction but a reshuffling — albeit a painful one for many. Researchers have estimated that for every job lost to the China shock, US households’ purchasing power rose by more than $400,000. The race for AI supremacy is on pause; the great giveaway has begun.

john.foley@ft.com

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

印尼中产阶级萎缩令企业感到不安

这个大宗商品大国未能产生更多的高薪工作,中产阶级人数正在不断下降。

2025年FT MBA排名:沃顿商学院蝉联榜首

面对来自替代课程的挑战和对学位未来的担忧,顶尖的MBA课程依然保持自己的优势。
16小时前

如钢铝卷入贸易战,英国将考虑对美产品征收关税

英国商务大臣称,若美国真的对英国钢、铝征税,那么英国将重新对包括威士忌、牛仔裤和摩托车在内的美国产品征收关税。

特朗普是否真要吞并加拿大?

关于加拿大成为美国第51个州的言论曾被视为轻率,如今却在渥太华引起不安。

人类的心智正在衰退

科技对我们的脑健康、能力和技能造成了负面影响。

美俄准备乌克兰和谈,欧洲仓促应对

在华盛顿和莫斯科开始谈判之际,法国将主办国家元首和政府首脑的紧急会议。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×